Shackling Pregnant Jailers Is OK
A bill that would have prohibited jail guards from shackling pregnant women did not pass this year in the General Assembly.
By Zack Budryk
Capital News Service
RICHMOND—Local jails and regional prisons in Virginia can continue to shackle female inmates during childbirth—a practice that Delegate Patrick Hope, D-Arlington, says is appalling. Hope sponsored a bill this legislative session to prohibit the shackling of women prisoners while in labor or giving birth. However, the bill is dead for this session after failing to make it out of a subcommittee last week.
But Hope isn’t giving up on getting correctional facilities to stop the practice.
“Having been the father of three girls, I couldn’t understand why they felt the need to do that,” he said. “And as I dug into the policies and what motivated the prisons and the local and regional jails to do this, [I found that] they really didn’t have a policy; they just shackled everyone … I thought there ought to be at least some law, something codified, that says they should use the least restrictive restraints … and use their discretion to make sure that safety’s not at risk.”
Katherine Greenier of the Virginia ACLU said the health risks posed by shackled delivery are well documented.
“Pregnancy can create problems with balance that are exacerbated by shackling,” said Greenier, whose Patricia M. Arnold Women’s Rights Project lobbied extensively for House Bill 836 before its demise. “Leg and wrist restraints increase the likelihood that a pregnant woman could trip, and they compromise her ability to brace against a fall, risking miscarriage and injury.”
The Virginia ACLU was joined in lobbying for the bill by several women’s rights and prison reform groups. The ACLU, which is known for supporting liberal causes, also found an unlikely ally: the Family Foundation of Virginia, which ordinarily supports conservative and religious causes. Hope said it was natural for his bill to attract support from groups with different political views.
“If a woman wants to have a pregnancy, and she wants it to be carried out, then we need to make sure that it’s carried out in a safe and healthy manner. That’s why [pro-choice groups] are at the table,” Hope said. “Virginia Family Foundation’s at the table for similar reasons. They see the pregnancy as a life, and we need to make sure that that pregnancy is protected so it is safe, and it is healthy, and everyone’s happy.”
HB 836 had been assigned to the House Militia, Police and Public Safety Committee. On Feb. 9, a subcommittee of that panel tabled the bill. As a result, the full House of Delegates did not have an opportunity to act on the measure. Any bill that did not clear its house of origin by Tuesday was declared dead for the session. Hope said he plans to reintroduce the issue next session. In the meantime, he said, he is exploring non-legislative ways of achieving the same goal.
Zack
4:11 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
The quote at the end, which is unattributed for some reason (it wasn't when I sent the piece out) is from Ramey Connolly of the Richmond Reproductive Freedom Project.
-Zack
Dan Telvock
4:24 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
Zack, the quote was supposed to be edited out and I missed it. Thanks