.

Council to Continue Riverfront Park Debate

Tuesday discussion comes after council voted to defer approving design process until it had more information.

Fredericksburg City Council will continue its discussion of Riverfront Park during Tuesday's work session.

At their Nov. 27 meeting, council members voted 5 - 2 to table any action on Riverfront Park, with Ward 2 Councilmember George Solley and At-Large Councilmember Kerry Devine voting against the decision.

The vote capped an evening of heated, sometimes contentious debate, which began in the work session and carried over into the regular session. The evening's regular session agenda included a vote to award the contract for design services for Riverfront Park, but that was put on hold until the board could have more discussion tonight.

Some council members want to move forward with the design phase of the park, which would build on the community recreational area located on the Sophia Street riverfront. 

Others want to hold off paying for a design until money is available to build the park and the park design is incorporated into a bigger plan for the Sophia Street area. Those who want to wait believe the money should be used for what they consider more important projects in the current fiscal climate

The vote is supposed to return to the regular session agenda no later than City Council's first meeting in 2013.

The Plan

Councilmember Solley outlined in an email to Ward 3 Councilmember Fred Howe the three part process for Riverfront Park. 

Phase 1 – Concept design and initial development. During this phase, the city created the Riverfront Task Force, adopted a concept, acquired land for the park and developed an interim park.

Phase 2 – Detailed design. This phase has two steps: one, detailed design of the park (this is the stage for which we have the current contract); two, development of construction documents.

Phase 3 – Construction. Build the park.

"Since this was a priority goal for the previous Council, it would have been on the agenda before now except for administrative delays in the contract process," Solley wrote in an email. "Council’s role in moving this initiative forward has already been defined and approved," Solley said.

"We’ve gone through the appropriate steps to obtain public input, and select a design firm in accordance with council's stated priorities," he said.  Solley said the design firm was unanimously chosen by council, a contract has been negotiated, and the contractor is ready to begin.

"This project has great level of support in the city at large," Solley said.

Ward 1 Councilman Brad Ellis disagreed.

"I still feel it’s not wise to spend money on a design that won’t be implemented in the next two years," he said.  Ellis says while the money may be available to pay for the design, the money is not available to build the project.

Mayor Mary Katherine Greenlaw told Fredericksburg Patch, "$200,000 is in this year’s current budget for design of the Riverfront Park." 

Greenlaw did not comment on what money would be available for the rest of the project. 

Priorities, Vision

"A parking garage is a higher priority, and we can’t afford one right now," Ellis said.  "So don’t spend money on a design," he said. 

Ellis said parking would contribute more to the economy of the area than would a design, by making it easier for residents and tourists to visit Downtown Fredericksburg.

"It is not an either or situation," Solley replied. "We [as a council] are decided to study and take action on parking," he said. "I think that not to follow through on this would not only set back our efforts to revitalize downtown and economically develop Sophia Street, it would also hurt our reputation," he said.  "It would be a bad move."

Councilman Howe disagreed. 

"I don’t believe this park at this time is going to bring anything to the downtown, because there is no parking and no comprehensive plan for the Sophia Street corridor," Howe said. 

"There is nowhere for folks to come; they aren’t using the parks we have already," Howe said. "Let’s get a vision together for the entire route and incorporate a park with other amenities at the same time."

Greenlaw said the park will be a stimulus for other downtown development. 

"I spoke with two property owners [today] who would be significant developers along Sophia street, and they said they need the park to do what they're going to do," Greenlaw said. 

Councilmember At-Large Matt Kelly said there are too many issues pending to approve a design, including conflicts with the Chesapeake Bay Act. 

"," he said.  "I had zero responses from the key players in this room, nor did staff respond to this," he said. 

"We’ve directed the city manger to move in this direction," Solley said.  "To stop the process now and back track on it, we are likely to loose the best firm we can get for advice," he said.

Tuesday's meeting begins at 5:30 p.m. in the second floor conference room at City Hall and is open to the public.

Related Stories:

Riverfront Park May Require Special Permits

Riverfront Park's Future: What's The Best Next Step?

City Moves to Buy Riverfront Lodge

Subscribe to Fredericksburg Patch's email newsletter.

Kevin Woodcox December 11, 2012 at 02:42 PM
Hugh waste of money. Spend the funds to improve areas outside of the downtown historic district.
Susan Larson December 11, 2012 at 03:19 PM
Matt: If you mean why is this just now on Fredericksburg Patch, it's because it took a while to confirm details received only a short time ago, and because the meeting is tonight. See the related story, too: http://patch.com/A-0mQc
Matt Holden December 11, 2012 at 05:13 PM
Kevin, I disagree. If Council is to do this right, there is a huge--HUGE opportunity to increase the tax base in downtown Fredericksburg by improving the opposite side of Sophia. Downtown is really the only place that can thrive considering Silver City is taking all over the place. It is absolutely nuts to pay a firm $200000 to create a design for a park when you don't have a plan to finance it. It is just going to sit on a shelf.
Liam December 11, 2012 at 05:54 PM
I feel strongly that a design is needed to move forward. Before you commission a design I think you need to clearly state your end game and I'm not hearing what the Council wants to accomplish from a $200,000 design project. The park isn't horrible right now. Form follows function. How will the parks function change? Living in Spotsylvania County I know I would get downtown more often, especially for big events, if parking were improved.
Kenny Johnson December 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM
Council will spend $99,000 for a concept, then $200,000 for construction documents. This doesn't include construction management & administration fees; so since design documents are typically in the 8 to 12% fee range, that puts this park a minimum of $3 million. 1) why isn't Council talking numbers? You don't need construction documents to get that number 2) why on Earth would you do a concept plan without answering the basic questions Palucci & Ellis asked? City could find out using in-house staff what the Bay Act requires, if the banks can be fixed, and soils conditions. 3) Why doesn't Council know what projects are in the queue waiting for funding or contracts? There should be no problem saying "It will cost around $3-4 million, so that means, projects X, Y & Z will be put on hold or a tax increase of X-cents." Yet Council doesn't hold staff to task on providing this info, and isn't smart enough to ask. Parking solutions will generate more econmic development than a park that currently can't be used after dark (no power / lighting). Fred Howe is correct; fix Sophia Street and a park will happen, not the other way around.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »